ºìÌÒÊÓÆµ

Skip to content

The care gap: Why supporting carers is core to professional project management

Added to your CPD log

View or edit this activity in your CPD log.

Go to My CPD
Only ºìÌÒÊÓÆµ members have access to CPD features Become a member Already added to CPD log

View or edit this activity in your CPD log.

Go to My CPD
Added to your Saved Content Go to my Saved Content
flexible working in project management

Professional project management is defined by the ability to deliver outcomes under constraint. Time, cost, scope, quality, risk and benefits must be actively balanced, assumptions tested and resources planned realistically.

Yet one of the most significant constraints affecting delivery capacity across the UK workforce is rarely treated as a planning variable at all: unpaid caring.

Census, with around one in seven people in any workplace combining paid employment with caring responsibilities.

For project-based organisations, this is not a peripheral people issue. It is a material factor in delivery performance, capability sustainability and organisational maturity.

Caring and ºìÌÒÊÓÆµâ€™s principle of structured planning

ºìÌÒÊÓÆµ places structured planning at the centre of professional practice: understanding constraints, dependencies, risk and realistic capacity.

Many delivery environments still assume:

  • Predictable availability 
  • Minimal disruption to working patterns 
  • Linear progression into senior roles 
  • Clear separation between work and personal responsibilities 

For working carers, particularly parents of children with SEND or those supporting people with complex or fluctuating needs, these assumptions often do not reflect reality.

When caring realities are excluded from project planning, organisations experience predictable delivery impacts: resource volatility, fragile schedules, increased handovers and avoidable attrition. This not a performance issue; it is a planning and design weakness.

Caring is a known constraint. Mature project environments plan for known constraints.

The legal context and its impact on delivery assurance 

In Great Britain, carer status is not a protected characteristic under the . 

Carers receive limited indirect protection through discrimination by association following , but courts have confirmed there is no duty to make reasonable adjustments for carers, as established in  

This weak legal baseline leads to inconsistent organisational responses. From a project assurance perspective, inconsistency undermines confidence in resourcing assumptions, risk registers and delivery forecasts.

Employment rights and residual delivery risk

From April 2024, employees gained a day-one right to one week ofHowever, Carers UK reports that cannot afford to use this entitlement. 

Unpaid leave does not remove delivery risk, it displaces it into sickness absence, reduced availability or workforce exit. This represents unmitigated schedule, cost and quality risk.

Carers as high-value project professionals 

Caring is not a signal of reduced capability. In practice, it develops skills that align strongly with the ºìÌÒÊÓÆµ Competence Framework. 

Carers often bring:

  • Advanced planning and prioritisation (Planning, resource management) 
  • Early risk identification (Risk and issue management) 
  • High resilience and adaptability (Leadership, professionalism) 
  • Strong stakeholder coordination (Communication, stakeholder engagement) 

These capabilities are critical in complex delivery environments. Supporting carers is therefore not about accommodation; it is about protecting and strengthening delivery competence.

A more diverse and skilled workforce 

Flexibility enables organisations to retain experienced professionals who would otherwise step back or leave entirely. This increases diversity across: 

  • gender 
  • age 
  • neurodiversity 
  • lived experience of public services and complex systems 

Diverse teams consistently demonstrate stronger problem-solving, risk awareness and decision quality, all core to effective project delivery. 

Improved retention and capability continuity 

Carers UK’s State of Caring 2025 report shows that reduce their hours and around one in five move into lower-paid or more junior roles due to caring demands.

Flexibility prevents the loss of experienced practitioners at mid-career, protecting organisational memory, leadership depth and benefits realisation. 

Planning projects around caring: ºìÌÒÊÓÆµ-aligned good practice 

Managing projects around caring responsibilities is a matter of better planning, not lower standards.

High-maturity practices include: 

Capacity and resource planning:

  • Treat caring as a predictable capacity factor 
  • Build contingency into schedules 
  • Avoid single-person dependencies in critical roles 

Flexible delivery design:

  • Measure performance by outcomes and benefits, not visibility 
  • Enable asynchronous working and predictable governance cycles 
  • Design flexibility into roles at all levels, including senior leadership 

Risk and governance:

  • Include caring-related absence in risk registers 
  • Use structured handovers and shared accountability 
  • Normalise flexibility through governance rather than discretion 

Leadership and professionalism:

  • Equip sponsors and managers to plan for human capacity realistically 
  • Recognise supporting carers as part of ethical leadership 
  • Caring, progression and the gender pay gap: A structural perspective 

Gender pay gap data shows widening gaps with age and thinning representation at . 

This is not a reflection of reduced capability. It is a consequence of how senior roles are designed and how availability is implicitly defined. When leadership and senior delivery roles assume constant availability, carers are structurally excluded from progression. Flexibility directly addresses this by keeping experienced professionals in leadership pipelines rather than forcing them to step back or leave.

Carers UK is campaigning for legal reform to strengthen workplace protections for carers, including formal recognition of If these changes are adopted, organisations will move from discretionary support to a legal obligation to accommodate caring responsibilities.

For project-based organisations, this presents an opportunity to act now, embedding care-aware planning, flexibility and governance into delivery structures ahead of regulatory change, and strengthening project maturity rather than reacting to it later. 

Conclusion: Flexibility as a marker of project maturity

Professional project management is about delivering reliably in real-world conditions, not idealised ones. 

Supporting carers through flexibility: 

  • Improves planning accuracy 
  • Strengthens risk management 
  • Retains skilled and diverse talent 
  • Builds delivery resilience

In project terms, flexibility for carers is not a people initiative; it is good project management practice and a marker of delivery maturity. 

 

You may also be interested in:

0Ìý³¦´Ç³¾³¾±ð²Ô³Ù²õ

Join the conversation!

Log in to post a comment, or create an account if you don't have one already.